Focus area 4

Governance, collaboration and resistance in environmental communication

As resistance to sustainability transformations is growing, environmental governance is under increasing pressure. Process facilitators and other governance practitioners face significant challenges in participatory processes, for example related to wind power establishments and climate policy. In this focus area we study how polarisation and resistance are reshaping power relations in collaborative governance and public participation.
Theme leader

Martin Westin

Martin works in the intersection between governance theory and practice. His research focuses on collaborative governance and participatory planning.

Collaborative governance is a governing arrangement that brings together actors across different interests, sectors and jurisdiction. It aims to further deliberation and collective decision-making to address public issues or manage resources. The normative core of collaborative governance is cooperation, dialogue and trust.  

Collaborative governance can play a constructive role to enhance legitimacy and improve effectiveness of decision-making processes by leveraging diverse knowledge, resources, and perspectives. It is particularly important for addressing “wicked problems” — complex issues like climate change and biodiversity loss — that often transcend geographical, political, and organizational boundaries. 

Today, tensions are mounting around sustainability transformations. Debates are often sharply polarized. Broad consensus in decision-making is becoming rarer, and organised resistance to sustainability policies, including by new interest-based groups and social movements, is on the rise. This often results in amplified antagonism and distrust. The prospects for collective decision-making today are becoming more tenuous. 

In our research, we set out from this broad contextual background to study the meaning and function of collaborative governance in environmental and sustainability politics. We are especially interested in the question of how mounting tensions around and resistance to sustainability policy affect power relations because such relations play a crucial role in shaping the viability and legitimacy of collaborative governance processes. We study how expertise and local knowledge are negotiated and utilized. And we seek to develop practical tools to make collaborative processes better equipped to deal with social and political tensions and resistance to sustainability transformations. 

We are currently doing work on three case studies of collaborative governance: climate change mitigation, management of invasive species and biodiversity loss, and large-scale infrastructure projects.  

We work closely with a partnership of practitioners, which consists of the following actors: the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, the Swedish Forest Agency, the Hunters’ Association, Greenpeace, Uppsala Municipality, and the Swedish Centre for Nature Interpretation at SLU 

Dialogue and collaboration network

Within the focus area, a network has been created for those who want to develop sustainability dialogues. Read more about the network and sign up at slu.se/mistraec/natverkdialogsamverkan (in Swedish).

People and organisations

Martin Westin, researcher at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

René van der Wal, Camilo Calderon and Miron Arljung, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Alexander Hellquist, Uppsala University

Christina Frimodig and Stina Söderqvist, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency

Raymond Wide and Johan Wester, Swedish Forestry Agency

Ida Wiking, Linda Ahlford, Helena Nordström-Källström and Emma Ringqvist, Uppsala municipality

Bodil Elmhagen, The Swedish Hunters’ Association

Eva K Sandberg, Katrin Jones Hammarlund and Jasmine Zhang, Centre for Nature Interpretation

Anna Lena Lohaus, Greenpeace

Joakim Lindmarker, Urban Minds

Find contact details to the team members here

Publications

Därför har vindkraften hamnat i motvind

News article
2025-12-17
Martin Westin skriver en essä i Svenska Dagbladet.

Analys: ”Klimatmedborgarråd måste välja – öka förståelse mellan meningsmotståndare eller stötta en viss politik”

Debate article
2025-09-16
Dagens medborgarråd försöker kombinera två svårförenliga syften: att möjliggöra samtalsdemokrati och vässa klimatambitionerna. I stället bör råden renodlas så att de antingen stöttar genomförandet av klimatpolitiken eller dämpar polarisering mellan meningsmotståndare genom goda samtal. Det skriver Alexander Hellquist, Martin Westin, Camilo Calderon och René van der Wal, alla aktiva inom Mistra Environmental Communication.

Grappling with post-truth politics – facilitation strategies for policy-making in troubled times

2025-05-28
Martin Westin, Sofie Joosse, Amelia Mutter & Miron Moraitopoulos Arljung writes in Critical Policy Studies.

The power of reflection: making reflective practice power-sensitive

Scientific paper
2025-08-04
Martin Westin,Robert Österbergh, Henrietta Forsman & Alexander Hellquist write in Reflective Practice.

Can Conflict Be Planned Away? A Critical Assessment of Participatory Land Use Planning in Swedish Forest Governance

Scientific paper
2025-01-27
A widespread governance response to land use conflict is to seek improved communication through the employment of dialogue-based instruments. In this paper, we interrogate the guiding presupposition that conflict can be planned away through a case study on the Reindeer Husbandry Plan (Renbruksplan), a tool used to address land use conflicts between industrial forestry and Indigenous Sámi reindeer herding. Annette Löf, 2024.

Rättviseargument blockerar Sveriges omställning

Debate article
2024-05-23
Robert Österbergh, Martin Westin, and Anke Fischer published a debate article in Dagens Arena. May 23, 2024

The Sustainability Walk – Combining Nudging and Pragmatism to Facilitate Collective Action and Reflection.

Scientific paper
2024-05-01
Westin M, Joosse S, Möckel F, et al. (2024) The Sustainability Walk – Combining Nudging and Pragmatism to Facilitate Collective Action and Reflection. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 28(2). 2: 40–57.

Negotiating Authority in Facilitation Practice – A Conceptual Framework to Describe Facilitators’ Use of Power in Collaborative Governance.

Scientific paper
2024-08-27
Westin M and Montgomerie E (2024) Negotiating Authority in Facilitation Practice – A Conceptual Framework to Describe Facilitators’ Use of Power in Collaborative Governance. Society & Natural Resources 0(0). Routledge: 1–20.