‘Co-creation’ as a driving force for just and equitable ecosystem restoration in rural areas

Ecosystem restoration projects financed through the sale of carbon credits can support equitable rural development if they are designed through a collaborative process approach known as ‘co-creation’, a new study shows. By applying six co-creation principles, such projects can address ethical concerns about carbon credits and support ecosystem restoration that is environmentally and socially just and equitable for local communities.
Researchers are sitting at a table, discussing together with local residents in Honduras.
Honduras. Photo: Leonard Palmberg

With more than 33 percent of the land worldwide being degraded, restoring damaged ecosystems is essential for achieving environmental sustainability and safeguarding biodiversity. However, restoration work is costly and needs financing. Restoration projects can sequester (capture) carbon credits and sell them in the voluntary carbon market (VCM), and thereby use carbon sequestration as a funding source. The VCM is commonly used by companies, non-profit organizations, and governments to buy and sell carbon credits.

However, concerns exist regarding this financing source. Some claim carbon credits have been used by wealthy corporations and countries to evade their environmental responsibilities, and they have not always benefited local communities. Despite the criticisms, carbon markets’ benefits can outweigh their drawbacks if properly regulated, and there are signs they will play a significant role in the fight against climate change. Co-creation approaches can be a pathway to designing socially just ecosystem restoration projects. Co-creation is a collaborative process that actively includes diverse stakeholders, especially local communities, in the design, implementation, and monitoring of ecosystem restoration initiatives.

The 2025 study, by Whitman et al., shows that a restoration project in eastern Honduras, funded by the voluntary carbon market (VCM), is supporting just ecosystem restoration and equitable rural development by adhering to six principles that use co-creation as a guiding framework.

The six guiding principles are:

  1. Treat carbon sequestration not as the end goal, but as a vehicle for equitable development.
  2. Adapt to the local context, which increases the likelihood of the intervention being sustainable.
  3. Support negotiated decision making, ensuring a sense of community ownership and responsibility for the project.
  4. Design social infrastructures that foster learning and innovation by establishing spaces for communication between diverse stakeholders.
  5. Diversify income streams, opening opportunities for funding in addition to the VCM.
  6. Pursue transparency to cultivate trust and shared sense-making.

 

While the project in Honduras is still in its early stages, the results are promising. In order to ensure that ecosystem restoration supports equitable development, time and flexibility are required, which isn’t always aligned with the economic priorities of other funding sources. By following the six principles rooted in co-creation, ecosystem restoration projects that use the VCM as a funding source can provide both things, allowing ecosystem restoration initiatives to contribute to increased equity, inclusion, and improved livelihoods.

Read the full scientific article here.

This text was written by Léon Videla Jeppsson, Intern within Focus area 5 – Transformation.

Popular science summary of Whitman, M., Powell, N., Bergström, M., & Rodriguez, M. (2025). Co-creating the design of equitable ecosystem restoration using the voluntary carbon market – six principles. Nature-Based Solutions, 7, 100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100202

 

Share this post
Facebook
LinkedIn

More updates

Students arrange a dialogue forum for democracy

In a student led initiative for democracy, Uppsala University, Mistra Environmental Communication and the Environmental Communication and Management programme at SLU invited five local youth political organizations to a dialogue forum to answer student’s burning questions for the upcoming September elections. Present at the dialogue forum were Ung Vänster (UV), Centerpartiets ungdomsförbund (CUF), Moderata ungdomsförbundet (MUF), Grön Ungdom (GU) and Liberala Ungdomsförbundet (LUF). The parties discussed public transport prices, the gap between recent graduates and the job market, the new law for international students limiting the allowed work time outside of university to 15 hours/week for students with residence permits, as well as local food production and food security.
Portrait photo of a smiling Sara.

Sara found a new direction in academia – now her research lives in the forest

Growing up in Storuman, a small town in the north of Sweden, a path to academia was far from a given. Today, Sara Holmgren’s research takes her from Kenya’s bustling cities to the forests of Hälsingland within the space of just a few weeks. Through her co-creative research, she challenges established ways of thinking and works to create change in practice.

M-EC Programme Laboratory 2026 (internal)

At this year’s M-EC Programme Laboratory we will explore the dynamic, complex and surprising interplay between feelings, facts and conflicts. We are interested in how this interplay shapes individual experiences, but also how it is shaped by social, political, technological and cultural factors. Please join us!

New perspectives on environmental communication arise when researchers and practitioners come together – welcome to the Environmental Communication Day

When facts alone are not enough and emotions play a significant role, the challenges facing environmental communicators grow. That is why Environmental Communication Day invites participants to reflect, share experiences, and gain new perspectives—drawn from both research and practice. In this article, you’ll hear from researcher Maria Johansson and practitioner Nina Steiner, who share their perspectives on this year’s theme and explain why this forum is needed.

“The topic was very timely” – Engaging conference on environmental communictaion and politics of disagreement

Different perspectives on the politics of disagreement were explored at the Environmental Communication Conference in April. The conference brought together over 100 researchers, communicators, policymakers, civil society actors and engaged citizens.  

M-EC in Almedalen: How can we foster constructive dialogue about the environment and sustainability?

Mistra Environmental Communication is attending Almedalen to host a panel discussion and a networking event. Come and meet us and talk about communication for sustainability!