‘Co-creation’ as a driving force for just and equitable ecosystem restoration in rural areas

Ecosystem restoration projects financed through the sale of carbon credits can support equitable rural development if they are designed through a collaborative process approach known as ‘co-creation’, a new study shows. By applying six co-creation principles, such projects can address ethical concerns about carbon credits and support ecosystem restoration that is environmentally and socially just and equitable for local communities.
Researchers are sitting at a table, discussing together with local residents in Honduras.
Honduras. Photo: Leonard Palmberg

With more than 33 percent of the land worldwide being degraded, restoring damaged ecosystems is essential for achieving environmental sustainability and safeguarding biodiversity. However, restoration work is costly and needs financing. Restoration projects can sequester (capture) carbon credits and sell them in the voluntary carbon market (VCM), and thereby use carbon sequestration as a funding source. The VCM is commonly used by companies, non-profit organizations, and governments to buy and sell carbon credits.

However, concerns exist regarding this financing source. Some claim carbon credits have been used by wealthy corporations and countries to evade their environmental responsibilities, and they have not always benefited local communities. Despite the criticisms, carbon markets’ benefits can outweigh their drawbacks if properly regulated, and there are signs they will play a significant role in the fight against climate change. Co-creation approaches can be a pathway to designing socially just ecosystem restoration projects. Co-creation is a collaborative process that actively includes diverse stakeholders, especially local communities, in the design, implementation, and monitoring of ecosystem restoration initiatives.

The 2025 study, by Whitman et al., shows that a restoration project in eastern Honduras, funded by the voluntary carbon market (VCM), is supporting just ecosystem restoration and equitable rural development by adhering to six principles that use co-creation as a guiding framework.

The six guiding principles are:

  1. Treat carbon sequestration not as the end goal, but as a vehicle for equitable development.
  2. Adapt to the local context, which increases the likelihood of the intervention being sustainable.
  3. Support negotiated decision making, ensuring a sense of community ownership and responsibility for the project.
  4. Design social infrastructures that foster learning and innovation by establishing spaces for communication between diverse stakeholders.
  5. Diversify income streams, opening opportunities for funding in addition to the VCM.
  6. Pursue transparency to cultivate trust and shared sense-making.

 

While the project in Honduras is still in its early stages, the results are promising. In order to ensure that ecosystem restoration supports equitable development, time and flexibility are required, which isn’t always aligned with the economic priorities of other funding sources. By following the six principles rooted in co-creation, ecosystem restoration projects that use the VCM as a funding source can provide both things, allowing ecosystem restoration initiatives to contribute to increased equity, inclusion, and improved livelihoods.

Read the full scientific article here.

This text was written by Léon Videla Jeppsson, Intern within Focus area 5 – Transformation.

Popular science summary of Whitman, M., Powell, N., Bergström, M., & Rodriguez, M. (2025). Co-creating the design of equitable ecosystem restoration using the voluntary carbon market – six principles. Nature-Based Solutions, 7, 100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100202

 

Share this post
Facebook
X
LinkedIn

More updates

PhD course and summer school: Environmental communication and the politics of disagreement

We are now inviting applications for the 2026 Mistra Environmental Communication PhD course and summer school! Join us for an exciting and engaging exploration of environmental communication perspectives on political struggles and disagreement.
People mingling at the Environmental Communicatin Day.

Environmental Communication Conference 2026: The Politics of Disagreement

Welcome to this annual environmental communication conference, hosted by the Mistra Environmental Communication research programme! This year’s conference has the theme “the politics of disagreement” and offers a platform for all researchers and societal actors to share and discuss research, develop collaboration and networks, and foster engagement.
A scale.

Three dilemmas in the climate debate that hinder a just climate transition

Why is it so difficult to achieve a climate transition that is considered to be just? A new study identifies three major challenges, which researchers believe originate from different understandings of what justice actually is.
A hand that holds a lump of soil.

How Human-Centred Narratives Undermine EU ‘Sustainable’ Agricultural Strategies

The European Union (EU) promotes carbon farming as a key part of the roadmap to climate neutrality. However, a recent study shows that deep down, EU policies are reluctant to embrace the profound transformations required for the climate crisis. By identifying dominant narratives buried within these policies, which at a surface level appear to strive for sustainable transformations, the study reveals that the EU policies reinforce the status quo. 

Course in planning for nature and culture interpretation (CIP)

Welcome to a certification course in planning for heritage interpretation. You will learn how to plan for meaningful experiences at a heritage site, based on the principles of interpretation, and how to use interpretation to provoke new perspectives, critical thinking and inspire active citizenship.

Mistra Environmental Communication PhD Sanna Barrineau is the recipient of the Dean Graduate Research Award for Outstanding Thesis at the University of the Sunshine Coast

We are happy to announce that Sanna Barrineau has successfully defended her thesis: “Thinking with Soils” – Care-full and relational perspectives on carbon farming futures and deep transformations. She has conducted her research within Mistra Environmental Communication Focus area 5 – Transformation. Sanna is the recipient of the Dean Graduate Research Award for Outstanding Thesis at the University of the Sunshine Coast for her PhD thesis.  Sanna explains what her research is about, her perspectives on environmental communication and what she hopes her research can lead to.