DN Debatt: ”Så blev den gröna omställningen ett rött skynke i debatten”

“Industriella storsatsningar och gruvprojekt kritiseras från många håll och uttrycket ”den gröna omställningen” har fått en besk bismak. Men varför heter det ens så? Är det en omställning och är den verkligen grön? Genom att blicka tillbaka på hur begreppet använts tidigare kan vi få insikter om framtiden”, skriver fyra experter inom Mistra Environmental Communication i en debattartikel i Dagens Nyheter.
En liten modellbil som är klädd i gräs.
Foto: Raghav Rocks/Adobe Stock (AI-genererad bild)

Läs artikeln i DN Debatt här.

Undertecknad av:

Anke Fischer, professor i miljökommunikation vid Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet (SLU)

Sofie Joosse, docent vid SLU och programchef för Mistra Environmental Communication

Nora Förell och Kornelia Johansson, doktorander i miljökommunikation vid SLU

Share this post
Facebook
LinkedIn

More updates

Students arrange a dialogue forum for democracy

In a student led initiative for democracy, Uppsala University, Mistra Environmental Communication and the Environmental Communication and Management programme at SLU invited five local youth political organizations to a dialogue forum to answer student’s burning questions for the upcoming September elections. Present at the dialogue forum were Ung Vänster (UV), Centerpartiets ungdomsförbund (CUF), Moderata ungdomsförbundet (MUF), Grön Ungdom (GU) and Liberala Ungdomsförbundet (LUF). The parties discussed public transport prices, the gap between recent graduates and the job market, the new law for international students limiting the allowed work time outside of university to 15 hours/week for students with residence permits, as well as local food production and food security.
Portrait photo of a smiling Sara.

Sara found a new direction in academia – now her research lives in the forest

Growing up in Storuman, a small town in the north of Sweden, a path to academia was far from a given. Today, Sara Holmgren’s research takes her from Kenya’s bustling cities to the forests of Hälsingland within the space of just a few weeks. Through her co-creative research, she challenges established ways of thinking and works to create change in practice.

M-EC Programme Laboratory 2026 (internal)

At this year’s M-EC Programme Laboratory we will explore the dynamic, complex and surprising interplay between feelings, facts and conflicts. We are interested in how this interplay shapes individual experiences, but also how it is shaped by social, political, technological and cultural factors. Please join us!

New perspectives on environmental communication arise when researchers and practitioners come together – welcome to the Environmental Communication Day

When facts alone are not enough and emotions play a significant role, the challenges facing environmental communicators grow. That is why Environmental Communication Day invites participants to reflect, share experiences, and gain new perspectives—drawn from both research and practice. In this article, you’ll hear from researcher Maria Johansson and practitioner Nina Steiner, who share their perspectives on this year’s theme and explain why this forum is needed.

“The topic was very timely” – Engaging conference on environmental communictaion and politics of disagreement

Different perspectives on the politics of disagreement were explored at the Environmental Communication Conference in April. The conference brought together over 100 researchers, communicators, policymakers, civil society actors and engaged citizens.  

M-EC in Almedalen: How can we foster constructive dialogue about the environment and sustainability?

Mistra Environmental Communication is attending Almedalen to host a panel discussion and a networking event. Come and meet us and talk about communication for sustainability!