AI Lund Lunch Seminar: ‘Green teaming AI’

This seminar discusses ongoing research seeking to identify, examine and rethink how “the environment” is configured into generative AI systems. Drawing inspiration from the method of ‘red teaming’ AI, we suggest ‘green teaming’ as a distinct approach to provide an initial step towards mapping the diverse ways in which ‘the environment’ is constituted in GenAI, including how it is overlooked.
Lone Thomasky & Bits&Bäume / https://betterimagesofai.org / https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

While the proliferation of commercial, GenAI applications and the hyperscaling of data centers has brought the environmental harms of these technologies into sharper focus, most notably their unsustainable resource use and energy demands as well as problems with green washing, the direct environmental impacts of the material infrastructure are not the only way in which the environment and GenAI interrelate. Although indirect environmental impacts and underlying values and assumptions are harder to identify, they remain highly influential and should be made visible.

Red teaming is typically conducted in technology companies to identify unintended, unsafe, and harmful outcomes of AI models. Recently, civil society and public sector organisations have begun to adopt red teaming in ‘the public interest’ or for ‘social good’. In the context of GenAI, this often means creating prompts to evaluate if outputs (images, text, or other modality) are suitable for a pre-defined use case, if they adhere to social norms or (unintentionally) reinforce harmful stereotypes. Usually, this involves collaborative exercises directed by different forms of expertise.

GenAI systems are transformative technologies that not only represent but are also constitutive of human–environment relationships. As their use becomes increasingly taken for granted, it risks glossing over disagreements essential to the workings of democracy by simultaneously siloing people even more, submerging sources in superficial but polished texts or images, homogenising different views, and complicating the presence and activity of commercial interests. Inadequate industry disclosure of the data, algorithms, design decisions, and business interests underlying consumer-facing GenAI applications often hinders recognition and ultimately the regulation of their shaping environmental values. Therefore, new methods and community-based approaches to examine how this occurs and what effects it has on environmental communication and meaning-making are needed.

Topic: Green teaming AI’

When: 8 April 12.00 to 13.00 CET

Where: Online – link by registration

Speakers

  • James Whitepostdoctoral researcher at the Department of Technology and Society, Lund University
  • Jutta Haider, Professor of Information Studies at University of Borås


Spoken language:
 English

Registration: To participate is free of charge. Sign up at ai.lu.se/2026-04-08/registration and we send you an access link to the zoom platform.

Project researchers:

  • Björn Ekström, Swedish School of Library and Information Science, University of Borås
  • Jutta Haider, Swedish School of Library and Information Science, University of Borås
  • Malte Rödl, Division of Environmental Communication, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • James White, Department of Technology and Society, Lund University
Share this post
Facebook
LinkedIn

More updates

M-EC Programme Laboratory 2026 (internal)

At this year’s M-EC Programme Laboratory we will explore the dynamic, complex and surprising interplay between feelings, facts and conflicts. We are interested in how this interplay shapes individual experiences, but also how it is shaped by social, political, technological and cultural factors. Please join us!

New perspectives on environmental communication arise when researchers and practitioners come together – welcome to the Environmental Communication Day

When facts alone are not enough and emotions play a significant role, the challenges facing environmental communicators grow. That is why Environmental Communication Day invites participants to reflect, share experiences, and gain new perspectives—drawn from both research and practice. In this article, you’ll hear from researcher Maria Johansson and practitioner Nina Steiner, who share their perspectives on this year’s theme and explain why this forum is needed.

“The topic was very timely” – Engaging conference Miljökommunikation och oenighetens politik

Different perspectives on the politics of disagreement were explored at the Environmental Communication Conference in April. The conference brought together over 100 researchers, communicators, policymakers, civil society actors and engaged citizens.  

M-EC in Almedalen: How can we foster constructive dialogue about the environment and sustainability?

Mistra Environmental Communication is attending Almedalen to host a panel discussion and a networking event. Come and meet us and talk about communication for sustainability!

Environmental Communication Day

Welcome to the Environmental Communication Day 2026—a practice-oriented forum where participants’ experiences, insights, and challenges play a central role. This year, we are focusing on the interplay between emotions, knowledge, and conflicts in the design of environmental communication.
Maria Brandt is holding a jar containing a butterfly she has captured with a scoop net.

Encouraging coexistence between wildlife and humans – through the power of stories

How do the stories we tell influence our perception of nature? At Biotopia, a museum about Uppland’s nature, Maria Brandt works with storytelling to create positive outdoor experiences for people. Together with professional storytellers and researchers, she explores how stories about carnivores such as wolves and bears can be crafted in new ways that create impact.