AI Lund Lunch Seminar: ‘Green teaming AI’

This seminar discusses ongoing research seeking to identify, examine and rethink how “the environment” is configured into generative AI systems. Drawing inspiration from the method of ‘red teaming’ AI, we suggest ‘green teaming’ as a distinct approach to provide an initial step towards mapping the diverse ways in which ‘the environment’ is constituted in GenAI, including how it is overlooked.
Lone Thomasky & Bits&Bäume / https://betterimagesofai.org / https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

While the proliferation of commercial, GenAI applications and the hyperscaling of data centers has brought the environmental harms of these technologies into sharper focus, most notably their unsustainable resource use and energy demands as well as problems with green washing, the direct environmental impacts of the material infrastructure are not the only way in which the environment and GenAI interrelate. Although indirect environmental impacts and underlying values and assumptions are harder to identify, they remain highly influential and should be made visible.

Red teaming is typically conducted in technology companies to identify unintended, unsafe, and harmful outcomes of AI models. Recently, civil society and public sector organisations have begun to adopt red teaming in ‘the public interest’ or for ‘social good’. In the context of GenAI, this often means creating prompts to evaluate if outputs (images, text, or other modality) are suitable for a pre-defined use case, if they adhere to social norms or (unintentionally) reinforce harmful stereotypes. Usually, this involves collaborative exercises directed by different forms of expertise.

GenAI systems are transformative technologies that not only represent but are also constitutive of human–environment relationships. As their use becomes increasingly taken for granted, it risks glossing over disagreements essential to the workings of democracy by simultaneously siloing people even more, submerging sources in superficial but polished texts or images, homogenising different views, and complicating the presence and activity of commercial interests. Inadequate industry disclosure of the data, algorithms, design decisions, and business interests underlying consumer-facing GenAI applications often hinders recognition and ultimately the regulation of their shaping environmental values. Therefore, new methods and community-based approaches to examine how this occurs and what effects it has on environmental communication and meaning-making are needed.

Topic: Green teaming AI’

When: 8 April 12.00 to 13.00 CET

Where: Online – link by registration

Speakers

  • James Whitepostdoctoral researcher at the Department of Technology and Society, Lund University
  • Jutta Haider, Professor of Information Studies at University of Borås


Spoken language:
 English

Registration: To participate is free of charge. Sign up at ai.lu.se/2026-04-08/registration and we send you an access link to the zoom platform.

Project researchers:

  • Björn Ekström, Swedish School of Library and Information Science, University of Borås
  • Jutta Haider, Swedish School of Library and Information Science, University of Borås
  • Malte Rödl, Division of Environmental Communication, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • James White, Department of Technology and Society, Lund University
Share this post
Facebook
X
LinkedIn

More updates

A picture of a sunset in nature, with a calm lake and rocky outcrops in the background.

How can we meaningfully portray nature beyond beautiful sunsets?

What does it mean to portray nature in a meaningful way, and what defines good or bad nature photography? During 2025, Wikimedia Sweden and researchers from the programme delved deeper into this. Eric Luth, project leader at Wikimedia Sweden, shares his insights from the collaboration.

Lunch webinar: Dialogue and collaboration in the sustainability transition

Welcome to a webinar on dialogue and collaborative processes, where researchers from Mistra Environmental Communication will present research findings and practical tools.

Naturlyftet webinar #1 Educator or activist?

How do we deal with situations where established knowledge is questioned? How can nature guides contribute to democratic dialogue? How can we assess when dialogue is possible and avoid conflicts escalating?
Three people standing and talking.

(Internal) Annual Programme Meeting

Welcome to the 2026 Annual Programme Meeting! During April 22, from lunch and including dinner, all programme partners meet for the annual programme meeting.

PhD course and summer school: Environmental communication and the politics of disagreement

We are now inviting applications for the 2026 Mistra Environmental Communication PhD course and summer school! Join us for an exciting and engaging exploration of environmental communication perspectives on political struggles and disagreement.
People mingling at the Environmental Communicatin Day.

Environmental Communication Conference 2026: The Politics of Disagreement

Welcome to this annual environmental communication conference, hosted by the Mistra Environmental Communication research programme! This year’s conference has the theme “the politics of disagreement” and offers a platform for all researchers and societal actors to share and discuss research, develop collaboration and networks, and foster engagement.